Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29134:2023vsIATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls map to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 maps to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(10 mappings)

27014-1Scope2 targets
IATF16949-Clause10-Improvement-Nonconformity-CorrectiveAction-Problem-ErrorProofIATF 16949 Clause 10 - Improvement + Nonconformity + Corrective Action + Problem Solving + Error Proofing + Continual Improvement
IATF16949-Clause9-Performance-Monitoring-InternalAudit-ManagementReviewIATF 16949 Clause 9 - Performance Evaluation + Monitoring + Internal Audit + Manufacturing Process Audit + Management Review
27014-3Terms and definitions2 targets
IATF16949-Clause10-Improvement-Nonconformity-CorrectiveAction-Problem-ErrorProofIATF 16949 Clause 10 - Improvement + Nonconformity + Corrective Action + Problem Solving + Error Proofing + Continual Improvement
IATF16949-Clause9-Performance-Monitoring-InternalAudit-ManagementReviewIATF 16949 Clause 9 - Performance Evaluation + Monitoring + Internal Audit + Manufacturing Process Audit + Management Review
29134-1Scope2 targets
IATF16949-Clause6-Planning-Risk-Contingency-Objectives-ChangeIATF 16949 Clause 6 - Planning + Risks and Opportunities + Contingency Plans + Quality Objectives + Change
IATF16949-Clause8-Operation-APQP-Design-Production-ControlPlan-SpecialCharsIATF 16949 Clause 8 - Operation Planning + APQP + Design + Special Characteristics + Production + Control Plan + Set-Up Verification
29134-3Terms and definitions4 targets
IATF16949-Clause10-Improvement-Nonconformity-CorrectiveAction-Problem-ErrorProofIATF 16949 Clause 10 - Improvement + Nonconformity + Corrective Action + Problem Solving + Error Proofing + Continual Improvement
IATF16949-Clause6-Planning-Risk-Contingency-Objectives-ChangeIATF 16949 Clause 6 - Planning + Risks and Opportunities + Contingency Plans + Quality Objectives + Change
IATF16949-Clause8-Operation-APQP-Design-Production-ControlPlan-SpecialCharsIATF 16949 Clause 8 - Operation Planning + APQP + Design + Special Characteristics + Production + Control Plan + Set-Up Verification
IATF16949-Clause9-Performance-Monitoring-InternalAudit-ManagementReviewIATF 16949 Clause 9 - Performance Evaluation + Monitoring + Internal Audit + Manufacturing Process Audit + Management Review

Clause 9: PIA Report(2 mappings)

29134-9.1PIA report structure2 targets
IATF16949-Clause6-Planning-Risk-Contingency-Objectives-ChangeIATF 16949 Clause 6 - Planning + Risks and Opportunities + Contingency Plans + Quality Objectives + Change
IATF16949-Clause8-Operation-APQP-Design-Production-ControlPlan-SpecialCharsIATF 16949 Clause 8 - Operation Planning + APQP + Design + Special Characteristics + Production + Control Plan + Set-Up Verification

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 29134:2023 comparisons

Other IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 has 43 controls across its framework, while IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 4 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

Of 43 total ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls, 5 map directly to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29134:2023 to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

38 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.