Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsZimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) with 38% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(12 mappings)

27011-1Scope4 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application
27011-3Terms and definitions4 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application
27400-3Terms and definitions4 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application

Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(3 mappings)

27400-5.4Data and privacy risks3 targets
Sec. 2Interpretation
UGA-2Interpretation
ZWE-2Definitions (Section 3)

Clause 6: IoT Security Controls(3 mappings)

27400-6.1Device identity and authentication2 targets
ZWE-11Biometric and Health Data (Section 12)
ZWE-16Notification and Accountability (Sections 20–24)
27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
ZWE-15Security and Breach Notification (Sections 18–19)

Clause 7: IoT Privacy Controls(2 mappings)

27400-7.1Data protection and privacy measures2 targets
ZWE-1Objectives (Section 2)
ZWE-4Designation of Authority (Section 5)

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons

Other Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)?

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 24 controls across its framework, while Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security, where 4 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)?

Of 24 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 9 map directly to Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)?

15 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.