Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsZimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) with 33% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Threat and Vulnerability Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Data Security and Privacy(6 mappings)

CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion3 targets
ZWE-1Objectives (Section 2)
ZWE-4Designation of Authority (Section 5)
ZWE-5Functions of Authority (Section 6)
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design3 targets
Sec. 2Interpretation
UGA-2Interpretation
ZWE-2Definitions (Section 3)

Infrastructure and Operations Security(11 mappings)

CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management2 targets
ZWE-11Biometric and Health Data (Section 12)
ZWE-16Notification and Accountability (Sections 20–24)
CSA-INF-04Incident Management5 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application
ZWE-15Security and Breach Notification (Sections 18–19)
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery4 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

Other Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Threat and Vulnerability Management, where 6 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 5 map directly to Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)?

10 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021). The highest concentration of gaps is in Threat and Vulnerability Management with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and Zimbabwe Data Protection Act (2021)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Threat and Vulnerability Management (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.