Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements with 16% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(1 mappings)

27400-5.4Data and privacy risks
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management

Clause 6: IoT Security Controls(1 mappings)

27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
NGCB-6Incident Response, 72-Hour NGCB Notification, and Independent Investigation

Network(1 mappings)

27400-7.1Network Security for IoT
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management

Clause 7: IoT Privacy Controls(3 mappings)

27400-7.1Network Security for IoT
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management
27400-7.3Data minimization and purpose limitation
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management
27400-7.4Data retention and deletion
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework, where 7 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 6 map directly to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

36 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.