Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29134:2023vsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls map to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 maps to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements with 9% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 318K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 318K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(8 mappings)

29134-1Scope4 targets
NGCB-1Regulation 5.260 Scope, Applicability, and Licensee Categories
NGCB-5Technical Security Controls - Access + Network + Encryption + Vulnerability + Logging
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management
NGCB-8Annual Independent Cybersecurity Assessment + Reporting + Board Oversight
29134-3Terms and definitions4 targets
NGCB-1Regulation 5.260 Scope, Applicability, and Licensee Categories
NGCB-5Technical Security Controls - Access + Network + Encryption + Vulnerability + Logging
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management
NGCB-8Annual Independent Cybersecurity Assessment + Reporting + Board Oversight

Clause 9: PIA Report(5 mappings)

29134-9.1PIA report structure4 targets
NGCB-1Regulation 5.260 Scope, Applicability, and Licensee Categories
NGCB-5Technical Security Controls - Access + Network + Encryption + Vulnerability + Logging
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management
NGCB-8Annual Independent Cybersecurity Assessment + Reporting + Board Oversight
29134-9.2Report findings and recommendations
NGCB-6Incident Response, 72-Hour NGCB Notification, and Independent Investigation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (318K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 has 43 controls across its framework, while Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 4 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 43 total ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls, 4 map directly to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29134:2023 to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

39 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.