Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management with 19% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(12 mappings)

27011-1Scope4 targets
23837-1.1Scope
27557-1Scope
27557-3Terms and definitions
27557-6.2Scope, context, and criteria for privacy
27011-3Terms and definitions4 targets
23837-1.1Scope
27557-1Scope
27557-3Terms and definitions
27557-6.2Scope, context, and criteria for privacy
27400-3Terms and definitions4 targets
23837-1.1Scope
27557-1Scope
27557-3Terms and definitions
27557-6.2Scope, context, and criteria for privacy

Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(2 mappings)

27400-5.4Data and privacy risks2 targets
27557-3Terms and definitions
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration

Device(1 mappings)

27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
23837-1.2Normative references

Clause 6: IoT Security Controls(1 mappings)

27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
23837-1.2Normative references

Clause 7: IoT Privacy Controls(2 mappings)

27400-7.3Data minimization and purpose limitation2 targets
27557-3Terms and definitions
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security, where 4 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

35 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.