ISO/IEC 27031:2011vsSWIFT CSCF
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls map to SWIFT CSCF. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27031:2011 maps to SWIFT CSCF with 30% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implement.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.
Foundation(3 mappings)
Clause 4-5: Overview and IRBC Concepts(3 mappings)
Strategy(4 mappings)
Clause 7: IRBC Planning and Objectives(4 mappings)
Operate(4 mappings)
Clause 8: IRBC Implementation(2 mappings)
+9 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 720 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27031:2011 comparisons
Other SWIFT CSCF comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 720 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and SWIFT CSCF?
ISO/IEC 27031:2011 has 27 controls across its framework, while SWIFT CSCF covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implement, where 4 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct SWIFT CSCF equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and SWIFT CSCF?
Of 27 total ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls, 14 map directly to SWIFT CSCF controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27031:2011 to SWIFT CSCF?
25 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct equivalent in SWIFT CSCF. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implement with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and SWIFT CSCF?
The domain with the highest gap count is Implement (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.