Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsPCI PIN Security

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to PCI PIN Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
72
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to PCI PIN Security with 14% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 91 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

DE - Detect(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
PCI-PIN-05Roles and responsibilities definition

GV - Govern(9 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk3 targets
PCI-PIN-16Due diligence and onboarding
PCI-PIN-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
PCI-PIN-19Concentration risk management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established3 targets
PCI-PIN-16Due diligence and onboarding
PCI-PIN-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
PCI-PIN-19Concentration risk management
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established3 targets
PCI-PIN-16Due diligence and onboarding
PCI-PIN-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
PCI-PIN-19Concentration risk management

ID - Identify(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained3 targets
PCI-PIN-23Regulatory reporting requirements
PCI-PIN-24Customer notification procedures
PCI-PIN-25Post-incident review and improvement

PR - Protect(7 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
PCI-PIN-05Roles and responsibilities definition
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected3 targets
PCI-PIN-13Third-party dependency management
PCI-PIN-14Critical service identification
PCI-PIN-15Communication and escalation procedures
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations3 targets
PCI-PIN-13Third-party dependency management
PCI-PIN-14Critical service identification
PCI-PIN-15Communication and escalation procedures

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 700 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and PCI PIN Security?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while PCI PIN Security covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 25 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct PCI PIN Security equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and PCI PIN Security?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 15 map directly to PCI PIN Security controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 91 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to PCI PIN Security?

91 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in PCI PIN Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and PCI PIN Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.