Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27014:2020vsISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls map to ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27014:2020 maps to ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems with 13% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(11 mappings)

27014-1Scope3 targets
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-56002-4.3Determining the scope of the innovation management system
27014-3Terms and definitions3 targets
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-56002-4.3Determining the scope of the innovation management system
29134-1Scope
ISO-22313-8.2Business impact analysis and risk assessment
29134-3Terms and definitions4 targets
ISO-22313-8.2Business impact analysis and risk assessment
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-56002-4.3Determining the scope of the innovation management system

Clause 5: Guiding Principles(3 mappings)

27014-5.6Continuous improvement3 targets
ISO-39001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-41001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-56002-10.2Deviation, nonconformity and corrective action

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27014:2020 comparisons

Other ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems?

ISO/IEC 27014:2020 has 39 controls across its framework, while ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems covers 167 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes, where 6 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls have no direct ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems?

Of 39 total ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls, 5 map directly to ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27014:2020 to ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems?

39 ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27014:2020 and ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Governance Objectives and Processes (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.