ISO/IEC 27010:2015vsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27010:2015 maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 36% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 9-10: Access Control and Cryptography(8 mappings)
Clause 11-13: Physical, Operations, and Communications Security(2 mappings)
Clause 14-16: System Development, Supplier Relations, and Incident Management(3 mappings)
Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance(3 mappings)
Clause 7-8: Human Resources and Asset Management(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons
Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?
ISO/IEC 27010:2015 has 25 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance, where 5 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?
Of 25 total ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls, 9 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27010:2015 to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?
16 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.