ISO 31000vsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)
See exactly how ISO 31000 controls map to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 31000 maps to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO 31000 controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Principles.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
ISO 31000: Risk Framework & Governance(2 mappings)
ISO 31000: Risk Monitoring & Review(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 31000 comparisons
Other OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 31000 and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
ISO 31000 has 43 controls across its framework, while OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Principles, where 9 ISO 31000 controls have no direct OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 31000 and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
Of 43 total ISO 31000 controls, 3 map directly to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000 to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
40 ISO 31000 controls have no direct equivalent in OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). The highest concentration of gaps is in Principles with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000 and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Principles (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.