TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 31000vsOECD AI Principles

See exactly how ISO 31000 controls map to OECD AI Principles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 31000 maps to OECD AI Principles with 14% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO 31000 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Principles.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 31000: Risk Framework & Governance(4 mappings)

ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope2 targets
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
→OECDAI-5Data Governance, Training Data Quality, Privacy, and Bias Mitigation
ISO31000-05Risk management integration2 targets
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
→OECDAI-5Data Governance, Training Data Quality, Privacy, and Bias Mitigation

ISO 31000: Risk Assessment(3 mappings)

ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection

ISO 31000: Risk Monitoring & Review(2 mappings)

ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance2 targets
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
→OECDAI-5Data Governance, Training Data Quality, Privacy, and Bias Mitigation

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 31000 comparisons

ISO 31000 vs NIST SP 800-397 mappingsISO 31000 vs NIST SP 800-377 mappingsISO 31000 vs NIST SP 800-307 mappingsISO 31000 vs German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)7 mappingsISO 31000 vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation7 mappingsISO 31000 vs ISO 270057 mappingsISO 31000 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsISO 31000 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System7 mappings

Other OECD AI Principles comparisons

Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) vs OECD AI Principles8 mappingsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs OECD AI Principles7 mappingsColorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) vs OECD AI Principles6 mappingsBrazil AI Framework vs OECD AI Principles6 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs OECD AI Principles6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs OECD AI Principles5 mappingsPrivacy Act 2020 vs OECD AI Principles3 mappingsTurkey KVKK vs OECD AI Principles3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 31000 and OECD AI Principles?

ISO 31000 has 43 controls across its framework, while OECD AI Principles covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Principles, where 9 ISO 31000 controls have no direct OECD AI Principles equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 31000 and OECD AI Principles?

Of 43 total ISO 31000 controls, 6 map directly to OECD AI Principles controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000 to OECD AI Principles?

37 ISO 31000 controls have no direct equivalent in OECD AI Principles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Principles with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000 and OECD AI Principles?

The domain with the highest gap count is Principles (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.