Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security ManagementvsNERC CIP

See exactly how ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls map to NERC CIP. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management maps to NERC CIP with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Personnel and Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Process and Procedural Controls(3 mappings)

ISO28001-PC-03Supply Chain Incident Reporting
NERCCIP-5System Security Management + Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments (CIP-007 + CIP-010)
ISO28001-PC-04Supply Chain Continuity Planning2 targets
NERCCIP-5System Security Management + Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments (CIP-007 + CIP-010)
NERCCIP-6Incident Reporting and Response Planning + Recovery Plans (CIP-008 + CIP-009)

Physical Security Countermeasures(1 mappings)

ISO28001-PS-01Facility Security
NERCCIP-5System Security Management + Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments (CIP-007 + CIP-010)

Supply Chain Security Assessment(1 mappings)

ISO28001-SA-04Security Risk Treatment Planning
NERCCIP-8Supply Chain Risk Management (CIP-013)

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management comparisons

Other NERC CIP comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and NERC CIP?

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management has 36 controls across its framework, while NERC CIP covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personnel and Information Security, where 4 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls have no direct NERC CIP equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and NERC CIP?

Of 36 total ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls, 4 map directly to NERC CIP controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management to NERC CIP?

32 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls have no direct equivalent in NERC CIP. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personnel and Information Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and NERC CIP?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personnel and Information Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.