ISO 28000:2022vsANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection
See exactly how ISO 28000:2022 controls map to ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 28000:2022 maps to ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection with 74% coverage across 32 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO 28000:2022 controls identifies 23 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause 8: Operation – ISO 28000:2022.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 849 frameworks | 314K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 314K+ mappings across 849 frameworks.
Clause 10: Improvement – ISO 28000:2022(2 mappings)
Clause 4: Context of the organization – ISO 28000:2022(6 mappings)
Clause 5: Leadership – ISO 28000:2022(3 mappings)
Clause 6: Planning – ISO 28000:2022(6 mappings)
Clause 7: Support – ISO 28000:2022(3 mappings)
+20 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 849 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A ISO 28000:2022 to ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection controls your existing ISO 28000:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 74% in the header counts how many ISO 28000:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 28000:2022 comparisons
Other ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 849 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 849 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (314K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 28000:2022 and ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection?
ISO 28000:2022 has 43 controls across its framework, while ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection covers 74 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 32 overlapping controls (74% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 8: Operation – ISO 28000:2022, where 7 ISO 28000:2022 controls have no direct ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 28000:2022 and ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection?
Of 43 total ISO 28000:2022 controls, 32 map directly to ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection controls, representing 74% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 28000:2022 to ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection?
23 ISO 28000:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 8: Operation – ISO 28000:2022 with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 28000:2022 and ANSI/ASIS PAP.1-2012 Physical Asset Protection?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 8: Operation – ISO 28000:2022 (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.