ISO 27018vsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
See exactly how ISO 27018 controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27018 maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 20% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 ISO 27018 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PII Principles.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
ISO 27018: Cloud Governance(6 mappings)
ISO 27018: Data Protection in Cloud(4 mappings)
ISO 27018: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27018 comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27018 and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
ISO 27018 has 45 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PII Principles, where 9 ISO 27018 controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27018 and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
Of 45 total ISO 27018 controls, 9 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27018 to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
36 ISO 27018 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in PII Principles with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27018 and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
The domain with the highest gap count is PII Principles (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.