TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27018vsMITRE ATT&CK

See exactly how ISO 27018 controls map to MITRE ATT&CK. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27018 maps to MITRE ATT&CK with 22% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 ISO 27018 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PII Principles.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

ISO 27018: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ISO27018-01Shared responsibility model definition
→MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container

ISO 27018: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

ISO27018-06Cloud identity management
→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
ISO27018-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
ISO27018-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container

ISO 27018: Data Protection in Cloud(3 mappings)

ISO27018-11Data classification for cloud
→MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures
ISO27018-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control
ISO27018-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt

ISO 27018: Cloud Infrastructure Security(1 mappings)

ISO27018-16Virtual network segmentation
→MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt

ISO 27018: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

ISO27018-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt
ISO27018-23Cloud vulnerability management
→MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27018 comparisons

ISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-14619 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-14419 mappingsISO 27018 vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsISO 27018 vs ISO 2701719 mappingsISO 27018 vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsISO 27018 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappings

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

OWASP MASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO 27043 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO 13485 vs MITRE ATT&CK5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27018 and MITRE ATT&CK?

ISO 27018 has 45 controls across its framework, while MITRE ATT&CK covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PII Principles, where 9 ISO 27018 controls have no direct MITRE ATT&CK equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27018 and MITRE ATT&CK?

Of 45 total ISO 27018 controls, 10 map directly to MITRE ATT&CK controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27018 to MITRE ATT&CK?

35 ISO 27018 controls have no direct equivalent in MITRE ATT&CK. The highest concentration of gaps is in PII Principles with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27018 and MITRE ATT&CK?

The domain with the highest gap count is PII Principles (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.