Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27005vsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act

See exactly how ISO 27005 controls map to Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27005 maps to Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO 27005 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Communication(1 mappings)

9.1Risk communication and consultation
MN-CDPA-Universal-Opt-Out-GPC-Sensitive-Data-Section-325O-02-Consumer-Health-Data-Children-Known-Child-TransgenderMinnesota CDPA Universal Opt-Out + GPC + Sensitive + Section 325O.02 + Consumer Health Data + Children + Known Child + Transgender

ISO 27005: Risk Assessment(3 mappings)

ISO27005-06Risk identification methods
MN-CDPA-Data-Privacy-Assessment-DPIA-Section-325O-07-Sensitive-Targeted-Sale-Profiling-AI-Consumer-HealthMinnesota CDPA DPIA + Section 325O.07 + Sensitive + Targeted + Sale + Profiling + AI + Consumer Health
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds
MN-CDPA-Data-Privacy-Assessment-DPIA-Section-325O-07-Sensitive-Targeted-Sale-Profiling-AI-Consumer-HealthMinnesota CDPA DPIA + Section 325O.07 + Sensitive + Targeted + Sale + Profiling + AI + Consumer Health
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis
MN-CDPA-Data-Privacy-Assessment-DPIA-Section-325O-07-Sensitive-Targeted-Sale-Profiling-AI-Consumer-HealthMinnesota CDPA DPIA + Section 325O.07 + Sensitive + Targeted + Sale + Profiling + AI + Consumer Health

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27005 and Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

ISO 27005 has 40 controls across its framework, while Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 8 ISO 27005 controls have no direct Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27005 and Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

Of 40 total ISO 27005 controls, 4 map directly to Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005 to Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

36 ISO 27005 controls have no direct equivalent in Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005 and Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.