Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27002:2022vsNIS2 Directive

See exactly how ISO 27002:2022 controls map to NIS2 Directive. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

88
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
68%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIS2 Directive controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27002:2022 maps to NIS2 Directive with 68% coverage across 63 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls identifies 46 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 88 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022(20 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::5.1Policies for information security3 targets
→nis2-directive::Art.20.1Management body approves the cybersecurity risk-management measures and oversees their implementation
→nis2-directive::Art.21.1Take proportionate all-hazards measures calibrated to the entity's own risk exposure
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.aPolicies on risk analysis and on information system security
iso-27002-2022::5.11Return of assets
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.iHuman resources security, access control policies and asset management
iso-27002-2022::5.12Classification of information
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.iHuman resources security, access control policies and asset management
iso-27002-2022::5.14Information transfer
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.jMulti-factor or continuous authentication, secured communications and secured emergency communications
iso-27002-2022::5.15Access control
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.iHuman resources security, access control policies and asset management
iso-27002-2022::5.16Identity management
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.iHuman resources security, access control policies and asset management
iso-27002-2022::5.17Authentication information2 targets
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.gBasic cyber hygiene practices and cybersecurity training
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.hPolicies and procedures on the use of cryptography and, where appropriate, encryption
iso-27002-2022::5.18Access rights
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.iHuman resources security, access control policies and asset management
iso-27002-2022::5.19Information security in supplier relationships
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.dSupply chain security, covering the relationship with each direct supplier and service provider
iso-27002-2022::5.2Information security roles and responsibilities
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.aPolicies on risk analysis and on information system security
iso-27002-2022::5.20Addressing information security within supplier agreements
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.dSupply chain security, covering the relationship with each direct supplier and service provider
iso-27002-2022::5.21Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
→nis2-directive::Art.21.3Take account of supplier-specific vulnerabilities and of Union coordinated supply chain risk assessments
iso-27002-2022::5.22Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services2 targets
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.dSupply chain security, covering the relationship with each direct supplier and service provider
→nis2-directive::Art.21.3Take account of supplier-specific vulnerabilities and of Union coordinated supply chain risk assessments
iso-27002-2022::5.23Information security for use of cloud services
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.dSupply chain security, covering the relationship with each direct supplier and service provider
iso-27002-2022::5.24Information security incident management planning and preparation2 targets
→nis2-directive::Art.21.2.bIncident handling
→nis2-directive::Art.23.1Notify significant incidents to the CSIRT or competent authority, and warn affected service recipients

+68 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ISO 27002:2022 to NIS2 Directive crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIS2 Directive controls your existing ISO 27002:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. ISO 27002:2022 into NIS2 Directive lands at 42.9%, while NIS2 Directive into ISO 27002:2022 lands at 24.7%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ISO 27002:2022 evidence buys you for NIS2 Directive, the other asks the reverse.

ISO 27002:2022 into NIS2 Directive
42.9%

12 of 28 NIS2 Directive controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27002:2022. 16 are genuine gaps.

NIS2 Directive into ISO 27002:2022
24.7%

23 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIS2 Directive. 70 are genuine gaps.

ISO 27002:2022 to NIS2 Directive
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 68% in the header counts how many ISO 27002:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIS2 Directive controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27002:2022 and NIS2 Directive?

ISO 27002:2022 has 93 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 63 overlapping controls (68% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022, where 12 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct NIS2 Directive equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27002:2022 and NIS2 Directive?

Of 93 total ISO 27002:2022 controls, 63 map directly to NIS2 Directive controls, representing 68% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27002:2022 to NIS2 Directive?

46 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022 with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27002:2022 and NIS2 Directive?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022 (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.