Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 26000:2010vsBREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

See exactly how ISO 26000:2010 controls map to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 26000:2010 maps to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 ISO 26000:2010 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 6: Core Subject — The Environment (6.5)(12 mappings)

ISO-26000-6.5.1Prevention of pollution6 targets
Ene 01Reduction of Energy Use and Carbon Emissions
Hea 02Indoor Air Quality
LE 03Ecological Value and Biodiversity
Man 03Responsible Construction Practices
Pol 02NOx Emissions
Wst 01Construction Waste Management
ISO-26000-6.5.3Climate change mitigation and adaptation3 targets
Ene 01Reduction of Energy Use and Carbon Emissions
Hea 02Indoor Air Quality
Pol 02NOx Emissions
ISO-26000-6.5.4Protection of the environment and biodiversity3 targets
LE 03Ecological Value and Biodiversity
Man 03Responsible Construction Practices
Wst 01Construction Waste Management

Clause 6: Core Subjects — Fair Operating Practices, Consumer Issues, Community Involvement (6.6-6.8)(1 mappings)

ISO-26000-6.6Fair operating practices
Mat 03Responsible Sourcing of Materials

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 26000:2010 comparisons

Other BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 26000:2010 and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

ISO 26000:2010 has 35 controls across its framework, while BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility, where 8 ISO 26000:2010 controls have no direct BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 26000:2010 and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

Of 35 total ISO 26000:2010 controls, 4 map directly to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 26000:2010 to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

31 ISO 26000:2010 controls have no direct equivalent in BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 26000:2010 and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.