Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 26000:2010vsSASB Standards

See exactly how ISO 26000:2010 controls map to SASB Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 26000:2010 maps to SASB Standards with 23% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 ISO 26000:2010 controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 6: Core Subject — Human Rights (6.3)(3 mappings)

ISO-26000-6.3.1Due diligence
SASB-SOC-1Human Rights and Community Relations
ISO-26000-6.3.2Human rights risk situations
SASB-SOC-1Human Rights and Community Relations
ISO-26000-6.3.3Avoidance of complicity
SASB-SOC-1Human Rights and Community Relations

Clause 6: Core Subject — Labour Practices (6.4)(2 mappings)

ISO-26000-6.4.4Health and safety at work2 targets
SASB-HC-2Employee Health and Safety
SASB-SOC-5Product Quality and Safety

Clause 6: Core Subject — The Environment (6.5)(6 mappings)

ISO-26000-6.5.1Prevention of pollution3 targets
SASB-BMI-1Product Design and Lifecycle Management
SASB-BMI-3Supply Chain Management
SASB-BMI-5Physical Impacts of Climate Change
ISO-26000-6.5.3Climate change mitigation and adaptation
SASB-BMI-5Physical Impacts of Climate Change
ISO-26000-6.5.4Protection of the environment and biodiversity2 targets
SASB-BMI-1Product Design and Lifecycle Management
SASB-BMI-3Supply Chain Management

Clause 6: Core Subjects — Fair Operating Practices, Consumer Issues, Community Involvement (6.6-6.8)(1 mappings)

ISO-26000-6.6Fair operating practices
SASB-BMI-3Supply Chain Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 26000:2010 and SASB Standards?

ISO 26000:2010 has 35 controls across its framework, while SASB Standards covers 23 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility, where 8 ISO 26000:2010 controls have no direct SASB Standards equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 26000:2010 and SASB Standards?

Of 35 total ISO 26000:2010 controls, 8 map directly to SASB Standards controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 26000:2010 to SASB Standards?

27 ISO 26000:2010 controls have no direct equivalent in SASB Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 26000:2010 and SASB Standards?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.