ISO 22316vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation
See exactly how ISO 22316 controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22316 maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 15% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 ISO 22316 controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 22316: BCM Testing & Exercising.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 445K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 445K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.
ISO 22316: BCM Program Management(1 mappings)
ISO 22316: Business Impact Analysis(1 mappings)
ISO 22316: Business Continuity Strategy(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22316 comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 725 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (445K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22316 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
ISO 22316 has 33 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 22316: BCM Testing & Exercising, where 5 ISO 22316 controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22316 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
Of 33 total ISO 22316 controls, 5 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22316 to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
28 ISO 22316 controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 22316: BCM Testing & Exercising with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22316 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 22316: BCM Testing & Exercising (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.