TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000vsISO 37001:2016

See exactly how ISO 22000 controls map to ISO 37001:2016. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000 maps to ISO 37001:2016 with 26% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 ISO 22000 controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Improvement(2 mappings)

ISO22000-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-37001-2016::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO22000-10.3Continual improvement
→iso-37001-2016::10.2Continual improvement

Context(1 mappings)

ISO22000-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-37001-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context

Leadership(2 mappings)

ISO22000-5.1Leadership and commitment
→iso-37001-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
ISO22000-5.3Roles, responsibilities, and authorities
→iso-37001-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

Planning(1 mappings)

ISO22000-6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-37001-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities

Support(1 mappings)

ISO22000-7.5Documented information
→iso-37001-2016::7.5Documented information

Evaluation(3 mappings)

ISO22000-9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis, evaluation
→iso-37001-2016::9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
ISO22000-9.2Internal audit
→iso-37001-2016::9.2Internal audit
ISO22000-9.3Management review
→iso-37001-2016::9.3Management review

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22000 comparisons

ISO 22000 vs ISO 22000:201820 mappingsISO 22000 vs ISO 45001:201813 mappingsISO 22000 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202313 mappingsISO 22000 vs ISO 14001:201513 mappingsISO 22000 vs ISO 22301:201911 mappingsISO 22000 vs ISO 37301:202111 mappingsISO 22000 vs ISO 27701:201911 mappingsISO 22000 vs ISO 9001:201511 mappings

Other ISO 37001:2016 comparisons

ISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 37001:201634 mappingsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 37001:201632 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37001:201632 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 37001:201629 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 37001:201628 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 37001:201627 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 37001:201623 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 37001:201623 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 22000 and ISO 37001:2016?

ISO 22000 has 39 controls across its framework, while ISO 37001:2016 covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 7 ISO 22000 controls have no direct ISO 37001:2016 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000 and ISO 37001:2016?

Of 39 total ISO 22000 controls, 10 map directly to ISO 37001:2016 controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000 to ISO 37001:2016?

29 ISO 22000 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 37001:2016. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000 and ISO 37001:2016?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.