TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000:2018vsISO 30401

See exactly how ISO 22000:2018 controls map to ISO 30401. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
52
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000:2018 maps to ISO 30401 with 20% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 70 ISO 22000:2018 controls identifies 56 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22000:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 70 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Clause 0 – ISO 22000:2018(1 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::0.3.3Risk-based thinking
→ISO30401-03Risk-based thinking and planning

Improvement – ISO 22000:2018(3 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action2 targets
→ISO30401-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→ISO30401-15Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement
→ISO30401-10.2Continual improvement

Leadership – ISO 22000:2018(3 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment
→ISO30401-5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities2 targets
→ISO30401-05Organizational roles and responsibilities
→ISO30401-5.3Roles, responsibilities, authorities

Planning – ISO 22000:2018(1 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→ISO30401-6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities

Support – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::7.1.6Control of externally provided processes, products or services
→ISO30401-09Control of externally provided processes
iso-22000-2018::7.5Documented information
→ISO30401-7.5Documented information

Operation – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::8.1Operational planning and control2 targets
→ISO30401-06Operational planning and control
→ISO30401-8.1Operational planning and control

Performance evaluation – ISO 22000:2018(6 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation2 targets
→ISO30401-11Monitoring, measurement, and analysis
→ISO30401-9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis, evaluation
iso-22000-2018::9.2Internal audit
→ISO30401-9.2Internal audit
iso-22000-2018::9.3Management review
→ISO30401-9.3Management review
iso-22000-2018::9.3.2Management review input
→ISO30401-9.3Management review
iso-22000-2018::9.3.3Management review output
→ISO30401-9.3Management review

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22000:2018 comparisons

ISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 9001:201555 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 27701:201942 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 45001:201837 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 14001:201536 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37001:201633 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 22301:201932 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37301:202132 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202331 mappings

Other ISO 30401 comparisons

ISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 3040119 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 3040116 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 3040115 mappingsISO 55001:2014 vs ISO 3040114 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 3040114 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 3040114 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 3040113 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 3040113 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 30401?

ISO 22000:2018 has 70 controls across its framework, while ISO 30401 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22000:2018, where 21 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct ISO 30401 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 30401?

Of 70 total ISO 22000:2018 controls, 14 map directly to ISO 30401 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 56 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000:2018 to ISO 30401?

56 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 30401. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22000:2018 with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 30401?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22000:2018 (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.