Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable ProcurementvsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework

See exactly how ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls map to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement maps to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Organising.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability(1 mappings)

ISO-20400-6.5Monitoring and continuous improvement
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk

Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process(3 mappings)

ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Other UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement has 40 controls across its framework, while UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework covers 5 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Organising, where 6 ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

Of 40 total ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls, 4 map directly to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

36 ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct equivalent in UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Organising with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Organising (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.