ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable ProcurementvsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)
See exactly how ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls map to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement maps to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) with 6% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls identifies 100 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 878 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 878 frameworks.
Superseded batch representation – ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement(11 mappings)
A ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls your existing ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 6% in the header counts how many ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement comparisons
Other OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 878 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 878 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement has 93 controls across its framework, while OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement, where 34 ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
Of 93 total ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls, 6 map directly to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls, representing 6% coverage. The remaining 100 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
100 ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct equivalent in OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.