Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 14004:2016vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ISO 14004:2016 controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 14004:2016 maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 10% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 ISO 14004:2016 controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support – ISO 14004:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Leadership – ISO 14004:2016(6 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment3 targets
AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment
AS9100D2016-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO27003-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-14004-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities3 targets
AS9100D-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities
AS9100D2016-5.3Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities
ISO27003-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

Planning – ISO 14004:2016(1 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
AS9100D2016-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities

Support – ISO 14004:2016(1 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::7.5Documented information
AS9100D2016-7.5Documented Information

Operation – ISO 14004:2016(3 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::8.1Operational planning and control3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
AS9100D2016-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 14004:2016 comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 14004:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ISO 14004:2016 has 48 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support – ISO 14004:2016, where 10 ISO 14004:2016 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 14004:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 48 total ISO 14004:2016 controls, 5 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 14004:2016 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

43 ISO 14004:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support – ISO 14004:2016 with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 14004:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support – ISO 14004:2016 (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.