Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 10005:2005vsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories

See exactly how ISO 10005:2005 controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 10005:2005 maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 11% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO 10005:2005 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Content of the quality plan – ISO 10005:2005.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Content of the quality plan – ISO 10005:2005(4 mappings)

iso-10005-2005::5.6Control of documents and data
ISO-15189-8.3Control of documents
iso-10005-2005::5.7Control of records2 targets
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records
ISO-17025-8.4Control of records
iso-10005-2005::5.9Requirements
ISO-15189-4.3Requirements regarding patients

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 10005:2005 comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 10005:2005 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

ISO 10005:2005 has 27 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 90 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Content of the quality plan – ISO 10005:2005, where 16 ISO 10005:2005 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 10005:2005 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

Of 27 total ISO 10005:2005 controls, 3 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 10005:2005 to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

24 ISO 10005:2005 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Content of the quality plan – ISO 10005:2005 with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 10005:2005 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

The domain with the highest gap count is Content of the quality plan – ISO 10005:2005 (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.