TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities
→DOM172-Supervisory-Authority-Cooperation-Sanctions-Penalties-Articles-77-79-Awareness-Training-Retention-DPO-DesignationDominican Republic Law 172-13 Supervisory Authority + Sanctions + Articles 77-79 + DPO + Awareness

ISMAP Cloud Operations(1 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudOperations-Monitoring-Logging-IncidentResponse-NISC-Reporting-Vulnerability-Change-SLAISMAP Cloud Operations - Security Monitoring + SIEM + Logging + Incident Response + NISC Reporting + Vulnerability Management + Penetration Testing + Change Management + SLA Management
→DOM172-Security-Measures-Article-25-Encryption-Pseudonymization-Access-Control-Incident-Handling-Breach-Notification-Article-22Dominican Republic Law 172-13 Security Measures + Article 25 + Encryption + Breach Notification

ISMAP Data Protection(2 mappings)

ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM2 targets
→DOM172-Security-Measures-Article-25-Encryption-Pseudonymization-Access-Control-Incident-Handling-Breach-Notification-Article-22Dominican Republic Law 172-13 Security Measures + Article 25 + Encryption + Breach Notification
→DOM172-Supervisory-Authority-Cooperation-Sanctions-Penalties-Articles-77-79-Awareness-Training-Retention-DPO-DesignationDominican Republic Law 172-13 Supervisory Authority + Sanctions + Articles 77-79 + DPO + Awareness

Related Comparisons

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs MITRE D3FEND5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Spain ENS5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs BSI IT-Grundschutz5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappings

Other Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data5 mappingsPakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 2023 vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data5 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data5 mappingsJamaica Data Protection Act 2020 vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data5 mappingsFederal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data5 mappingsIowa Consumer Data Protection Act vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data5 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data5 mappingsKentucky Consumer Data Protection Act vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 3 map directly to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

5 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.