TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsItaly Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities
→ItalyCodice-DataSubjectRights-Limitations-Deceased-Minors-14-Years-Italian-2undecies-2duodecies-2terdeciesItaly Codice Data Subject Rights + Article 2-undecies Limitations + Article 2-duodecies Deceased Persons Rights + Article 2-terdecies Minors Rights (14 Years Consent Age) + GDPR Articles 15-22 + Italian Civil Procedure Remedies

ISMAP Data Protection(2 mappings)

ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM2 targets
→ItalyCodice-Garante-Enforcement-AdministrativeSanctions-Criminal-Art166-167-170-20MEUR-Coord-EDPBItaly Codice Garante Authority + Article 140-bis + Article 144 Complaints + Article 166 Administrative Sanctions up to EUR 20M/4% + Article 167 Criminal Offences + Article 170 Failure to Comply with Garante Orders + EDPB Coordination
→ItalyCodice-ePrivacy-Cookies-ElectronicCommunications-Telemarketing-PublicOpposition-TrafficDataRetention-Art121-122-130-132Italy Codice ePrivacy - Article 121 Electronic Communications + Article 122 Cookies and Tracking + Article 130 Unsolicited Direct Marketing + Article 132 Traffic Data Retention + Italian Public Opposition Register (Registro delle Opposizioni)

Related Comparisons

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP ASVS5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs MITRE D3FEND5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs BSI IT-Grundschutz5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappings

Other Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)4 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)4 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)4 mappingsAzerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)4 mappingsFederal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)4 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)4 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)4 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)?

ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)?

Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 2 map directly to Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)?

6 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.