ISMAP (Japan)vsISO 9001:2015
See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to ISO 9001:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISMAP (Japan) maps to ISO 9001:2015 with 12% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.
ISMAP Cloud Governance(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons
Other ISO 9001:2015 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 700 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO 9001:2015?
ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 9001:2015 covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct ISO 9001:2015 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO 9001:2015?
Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 1 map directly to ISO 9001:2015 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to ISO 9001:2015?
7 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 9001:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO 9001:2015?
The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.