Cross-Framework Mapping

Indiana Consumer Data Protection ActvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Indiana CDPA Security + Breach + Records(6 mappings)

INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification6 targets
3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
3.6.1Incident Response Capability
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Indiana CDPA Sensitive Data + DPA(1 mappings)

INCDPA-SensitiveData-Children-Consent-COPPA-DataProtectionAssessment-DPIAIndiana CDPA Sensitive Data + Consent for Sensitive Categories + Children Under 13 + COPPA Coordination + Data Protection Assessment (DPA) + High-Risk Processing
3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

Related Comparisons

Other Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional, where 1 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 8 total Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls, 2 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

6 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.