Cross-Framework Mapping

IEEE 1686vsFrench Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)

See exactly how IEEE 1686 controls map to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
57%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEEE 1686 maps to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) with 57% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 7 IEEE 1686 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 7 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

IEEE 1686 IR + Recovery + Reporting(2 mappings)

IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills2 targets
Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)

IEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Access Control(2 mappings)

IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel2 targets
Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)

IEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware + Config + Time + Data(1 mappings)

IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)

IEEE 1686 Section 6 + Supply Chain + Procurement + Physical(1 mappings)

IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IEEE 1686 and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

IEEE 1686 has 7 controls across its framework, while French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (57% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications, where 1 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) equivalent.

How many controls map between IEEE 1686 and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

Of 7 total IEEE 1686 controls, 4 map directly to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls — representing 57% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEEE 1686 to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

3 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct equivalent in French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691). The highest concentration of gaps is in IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEEE 1686 and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

The domain with the highest gap count is IEEE 1686 Section 5.4 - Communications (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.