TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication SecurityvsILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)

See exactly how IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls map to ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security maps to ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management(1 mappings)

62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
→ILO-MNE-SectionE-ConditionsOfWorkAndLife-Wages-Benefits-OSH-MinAge-Para34to41ILO MNE Declaration Section E Conditions of Work and Life - Wages + Benefits + Conditions of Work + Minimum Age + Safety and Health (Paras 34-41)

Related Comparisons

Other IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST Privacy Framework5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs ISO 27001:20225 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs ISO 20000-15 mappings

Other ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) comparisons

MiFID II / MiFIR vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)1 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)1 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)1 mappingsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)1 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)1 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)1 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)1 mappingsHL7 FHIR Security Framework vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)?

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security has 34 controls across its framework, while ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring, where 3 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)?

Of 34 total IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls, 1 map directly to ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security to ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)?

33 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration). The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.