TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication SecurityvsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 12% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

62351-14Cyber security event logging
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring

Parts 1-2: Introduction and Glossary(1 mappings)

62351-2Glossary of terms
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance

Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management(5 mappings)

62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)3 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
62351-9Cyber security key management2 targets
→AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

Related Comparisons

Other IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST Privacy Framework5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs ISO 27001:20225 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs ISO 20000-15 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsSLSA vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsPTES vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOWASP SAMM vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security has 34 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring, where 2 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 34 total IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls, 4 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

30 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.