Cross-Framework Mapping

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive ProductionvsFTC Health Breach Notification Rule

See exactly how IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls map to FTC Health Breach Notification Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production maps to FTC Health Breach Notification Rule with 28% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7 - Support.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 10 - Improvement(3 mappings)

IATF-10.3Continual Improvement3 targets
64.2003Definitions
Art. 2Consent Definition
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Clause 4 - Context of the Organization(1 mappings)

IATF-4.4Quality Management System and Its Processes
PSTI-CMP-03Enforcement and Penalties

Clause 5 - Leadership(1 mappings)

IATF-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities and Authorities
PSTI-CMP-03Enforcement and Penalties

Clause 6 - Planning(4 mappings)

IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities4 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
PSTI-CMP-03Enforcement and Penalties

Clause 8 - Operation(5 mappings)

IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
IATF-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products and Services2 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EUDR-CE-03Penalties

Clause 9 - Performance Evaluation(3 mappings)

IATF-9.2Internal Audit3 targets
64.2003Definitions
Art. 2Consent Definition
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons

Other FTC Health Breach Notification Rule comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and FTC Health Breach Notification Rule?

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production has 25 controls across its framework, while FTC Health Breach Notification Rule covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7 - Support, where 4 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls have no direct FTC Health Breach Notification Rule equivalent.

How many controls map between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and FTC Health Breach Notification Rule?

Of 25 total IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls, 7 map directly to FTC Health Breach Notification Rule controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production to FTC Health Breach Notification Rule?

18 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Health Breach Notification Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7 - Support with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and FTC Health Breach Notification Rule?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7 - Support (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.