Cross-Framework Mapping

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive ProductionvsASEAN Data Management Framework

See exactly how IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls map to ASEAN Data Management Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production maps to ASEAN Data Management Framework with 28% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7 - Support.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 10 - Improvement(5 mappings)

IATF-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action3 targets
DMF-6.3Continuous Improvement
DMF-6.4Incident Response and Learning
ISO28001-MI-02Internal Security Audits
IATF-10.3Continual Improvement2 targets
Art. 17Governance Structure
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities

Clause 4 - Context of the Organization(3 mappings)

IATF-4.4Quality Management System and Its Processes3 targets
DMF-6.3Continuous Improvement
DMF-6.4Incident Response and Learning
ISO28001-MI-02Internal Security Audits

Clause 6 - Planning(3 mappings)

IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities3 targets
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment

Clause 8 - Operation(6 mappings)

IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control3 targets
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment
IATF-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products and Services3 targets
ISO28001-MI-02Internal Security Audits
ISO28001-MI-03Management Review of Security Program
ISO28001-MI-04Corrective and Preventive Actions

Clause 9 - Performance Evaluation(2 mappings)

IATF-9.2Internal Audit2 targets
Art. 17Governance Structure
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities

Related Comparisons

Other IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons

Other ASEAN Data Management Framework comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and ASEAN Data Management Framework?

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production has 25 controls across its framework, while ASEAN Data Management Framework covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7 - Support, where 4 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls have no direct ASEAN Data Management Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and ASEAN Data Management Framework?

Of 25 total IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls, 7 map directly to ASEAN Data Management Framework controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production to ASEAN Data Management Framework?

18 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls have no direct equivalent in ASEAN Data Management Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7 - Support with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and ASEAN Data Management Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7 - Support (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.