TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsLloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards

See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards with 9% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

IAEA NSS-17 Graded Approach + Security Levels + Risk + DBT(2 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-GradedApproach-SecurityLevels-Risk-DBTIAEA NSS-17 - Graded Approach + Computer Security Levels + Risk-Informed Methodology + Threat Assessment + DBT Alignment + Consequence Analysis2 targets
→LLOYDS-CI-Risk-Selection-Cyber-Hygiene-Underwriting-Criteria-Pre-Bind-Risk-Engineering-MFA-Backup-EDRLloyds Cyber Insurance Risk Selection + Hygiene + Pre-Bind Engineering
→LLOYDS-CI-Systemic-Cyber-Risk-Aggregation-Cyber-Catastrophe-Modelling-Vendor-Use-RDS-Scenario-TestingLloyds Cyber Insurance Systemic Aggregation + Catastrophe Modelling + RDS

Related Comparisons

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.08 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20227 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security7 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO 27001:20226 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20246 mappings

Other Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards2 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards2 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards2 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards2 mappingsTurkey KVKK vs Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards2 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards2 mappingsPCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) vs Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards2 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 11 controls across its framework, while Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement, where 1 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards equivalent.

How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?

Of 11 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 1 map directly to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?

10 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?

The domain with the highest gap count is IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.