TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)

See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

IAEA NSS-17 Access Control(1 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-AccessControl-OT-IT-Authentication-AuthorizationIAEA NSS-17 - Access Control + Authentication + Authorization + IAM + Privileged Access for OT and IT
→ICELAND-Act90-Chap4-Security-BreachNotification-DPIA-Personuvernd-72hrIceland Act 90/2018 - Chapter IV Security of Processing + Breach Notification + DPIA (Articles 27-29)

IAEA NSS-17 Detect + IR + Recovery(1 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises
→ICELAND-Act90-Chap4-Security-BreachNotification-DPIA-Personuvernd-72hrIceland Act 90/2018 - Chapter IV Security of Processing + Breach Notification + DPIA (Articles 27-29)

IAEA NSS-17 Graded Approach + Security Levels + Risk + DBT(1 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-GradedApproach-SecurityLevels-Risk-DBTIAEA NSS-17 - Graded Approach + Computer Security Levels + Risk-Informed Methodology + Threat Assessment + DBT Alignment + Consequence Analysis
→ICELAND-Act90-Chap4-Security-BreachNotification-DPIA-Personuvernd-72hrIceland Act 90/2018 - Chapter IV Security of Processing + Breach Notification + DPIA (Articles 27-29)

Related Comparisons

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.08 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20227 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security7 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20246 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappings

Other Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) comparisons

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappingsIowa Consumer Data Protection Act vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappingsIEEE 7000 vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)?

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 11 controls across its framework, while Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement, where 1 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)?

Of 11 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 3 map directly to Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)?

8 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.