Cross-Framework Mapping

HL7 FHIR Security FrameworkvsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HL7 FHIR Security Framework maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 43% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 7 HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FHIR Security Framework: Scope, FHIR R4/R5/R6 Versions, HL7 Specification + Security/Privacy Module.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 7 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

FHIR Security: Audit + Provenance + Digital Signatures + AuditEvent + Resource Integrity(1 mappings)

HL7-FHIR-Audit-Provenance-DigitalSignatures-IntegrityHL7 FHIR Audit + Provenance + Digital Signatures + AuditEvent Resource + Audit Log Integrity + Retention
AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring

FHIR Security: Authentication + SMART App Launch + OpenID Connect + Backend Services + Token Lifetime(3 mappings)

HL7-FHIR-Auth-SMART-OAuth-OIDC-BackendHL7 FHIR Authentication - SMART App Launch + OAuth 2.0 + OpenID Connect + Backend Services + Token Lifetime3 targets
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms

FHIR Security: Transport TLS + Communication + Time Keeping + Server CapabilityStatement(3 mappings)

HL7-FHIR-Transport-TLS-CommunicationHL7 FHIR Transport Security - TLS 1.2+, Communication Security, Time Keeping, Server CapabilityStatement3 targets
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between HL7 FHIR Security Framework and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

HL7 FHIR Security Framework has 7 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FHIR Security Framework: Scope, FHIR R4/R5/R6 Versions, HL7 Specification + Security/Privacy Module, where 1 HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between HL7 FHIR Security Framework and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 7 total HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls, 3 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HL7 FHIR Security Framework to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

4 HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in FHIR Security Framework: Scope, FHIR R4/R5/R6 Versions, HL7 Specification + Security/Privacy Module with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HL7 FHIR Security Framework and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is FHIR Security Framework: Scope, FHIR R4/R5/R6 Versions, HL7 Specification + Security/Privacy Module (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.