Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 28% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in iCAST.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Domain 1: Governance(10 mappings)

CRAF-1.1Cyber Risk Governance3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy5 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability

Domain 2: Identification(3 mappings)

CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy

Domain 3: Protection(3 mappings)

CRAF-3.6Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework

Domain 4: Detection(4 mappings)

CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence2 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-01Security Monitoring and Detection
CRAF-4.3Security Testing2 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-03Cybersecurity Testing
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 716 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 716 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 43 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in iCAST, where 5 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

Of 43 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 12 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

31 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in iCAST with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

The domain with the highest gap count is iCAST (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.