Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) with 18% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

HKMA C-RAF Domain 1-2: Governance + Identification (Cyber Strategy, Risk Mgmt, Asset Mgmt, Threat Assessment)(2 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment2 targets
AT-DSG-2Section 2 - Scope and application
AT-DSG-8Section 22 - Functions and powers of the DPA

HKMA C-RAF Domain 3-4: Protection + Detection (Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing)(1 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel
AT-DSG-6Sections 12-13 - Image processing (video surveillance/CCTV)

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 11 controls across its framework, while Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline, where 4 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

Of 11 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 2 map directly to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

9 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.