HIPAA Security RulevsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)
See exactly how HIPAA Security Rule controls map to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HIPAA Security Rule maps to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) with 66% coverage across 44 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls identifies 23 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Administrative.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 67 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 75 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Administrative(20 mappings)
+55 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The HIPAA Security Rule to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls your existing HIPAA Security Rule work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
14 of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for HIPAA Security Rule. 25 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Risk management supplies mitigation, monitoring and remediation of identified deficiencies.
Grounded in 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B) Risk Management (Required). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Address capacity and performance planning within the program, including controls for monitoring systems to ensure adequate scalable capacity and testing, monitoring and analysis of current and projected capacity and performance and of...
Every one of the 14 evidenced controls and 25 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
19 of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). 48 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Requires a programme of risk analysis and oversight to identify and minimise operational risk.
Grounded in CFTC-SS-1 Program of Risk Analysis and Oversight. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Covered entities and business associates must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all electronic protected health information (ePHI) they create, receive, maintain, or transmit; protect against reasonably anticipated...
Every one of the 19 evidenced controls and 48 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 66% in the header counts how many HIPAA Security Rule controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other HIPAA Security Rule comparisons
Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HIPAA Security Rule and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
HIPAA Security Rule has 67 controls across its framework, while CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 44 overlapping controls (66% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Administrative, where 9 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) equivalent.
How many controls map between HIPAA Security Rule and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
Of 67 total HIPAA Security Rule controls, 44 map directly to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, representing 66% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HIPAA Security Rule to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
23 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct equivalent in CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). The highest concentration of gaps is in Administrative with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HIPAA Security Rule and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Administrative (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.