Cross-Framework Mapping

GLBAvsISO/IEC 27400:2022

See exactly how GLBA controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GLBA maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 18% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 GLBA controls identifies 23 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Subtitle A: Disclosure of nonpublic personal information (sections 501 to 510, 15 U.S.C. 6801 to 6809) – GLBA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 907 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 907 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – GLBA(6 mappings)

GLBA-Implementation-Roadmap-ExaminationGLBA Implementation Roadmap, Examination Readiness, Roles and Tooling
→27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
GLBA-Sec6801-PolicyDuty-SafeguardingStandardGLBA Section 6801 - Privacy Obligation Policy and Safeguarding Standard
→27400-3Terms and definitions
GLBA-Status-FTC-CFPB-SEC-NAIC-EnforcementGLBA Status, Enforcement Activity, FTC + CFPB + SEC + NAIC Recent Actions
→27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
GLBA-Subordinate-Rules-OperationalisationGLBA Operationalisation through FTC Safeguards Rule, Privacy Rule, SEC Reg S-P and Banking-Agency Guidelines3 targets
→27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
→27400-6.3Secure Update Mechanism
→27400-6.4Default Configuration Security
Coverage crosswalk

A GLBA to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls your existing GLBA work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

GLBA into ISO/IEC 27400:2022
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 into GLBA
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

GLBA to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 18% in the header counts how many GLBA controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 907 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 907 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between GLBA and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

GLBA has 22 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 85 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subtitle A: Disclosure of nonpublic personal information (sections 501 to 510, 15 U.S.C. 6801 to 6809) – GLBA, where 12 GLBA controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between GLBA and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

Of 22 total GLBA controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, representing 18% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GLBA to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

23 GLBA controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Subtitle A: Disclosure of nonpublic personal information (sections 501 to 510, 15 U.S.C. 6801 to 6809) – GLBA with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GLBA and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subtitle A: Disclosure of nonpublic personal information (sections 501 to 510, 15 U.S.C. 6801 to 6809) – GLBA (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.