Cross-Framework Mapping

Ghana Cybersecurity ActvsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

See exactly how Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Ghana Cybersecurity Act maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 50% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Ghana CSA: Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) Designation, Plan, Audit and Risk Assessment(7 mappings)

GhCSA-CII-Designation-Plan-Audit-RiskCII Designation, Registration, Cybersecurity Plan, Audit and Risk Assessment7 targets
171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication
171A-IA-02Assess Multi-Factor Authentication

Ghana CSA: Cybercrime Offences, Lawful Access and Preservation(2 mappings)

GhCSA-Cybercrime-Lawful-Access-PreservationCybercrime Offences, Lawful Access and Electronic Evidence Preservation2 targets
171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
171A-IR-02Assess Incident Response Testing

Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status(9 mappings)

GhCSA-Implementation-RoadmapImplementation Roadmap - Organizational Roles, Tooling and Metrics9 targets
171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration
171A-CM-02Assess Configuration Change Control
171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
171A-IR-02Assess Incident Response Testing
171A-SI-01Assess Flaw Remediation
171A-SI-03Assess System Monitoring

Ghana CSA: Cybersecurity Incident Reporting (24-Hour to CSA) and National CERT-GH(2 mappings)

GhCSA-Incident-Reporting-CERT-GHCybersecurity Incident Reporting (24-Hour to CSA) and National CERT-GH Engagement2 targets
171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Ghana Cybersecurity Act comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Ghana Cybersecurity Act has 12 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status, where 5 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.

How many controls map between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Of 12 total Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Ghana Cybersecurity Act to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

6 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.