TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

GDPRvsConnecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)

See exactly how GDPR controls map to Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GDPR maps to Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) with 32% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 GDPR controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 359K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 359K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Chapter III - Rights of the Data Subject(5 mappings)

GDPR-Art.13Information to be provided where personal data are collected
→CTDPA-42-520-PRIVNOTICEPrivacy Notice
GDPR-Art.15Right of access by the data subject
→CTDPA-42-518-ACCESSRight to Confirm and Access
GDPR-Art.16Right to rectification
→CTDPA-42-518-CORRECTRight to Correct
GDPR-Art.17Right to erasure (right to be forgotten)
→CTDPA-42-518-DELETERight to Delete
GDPR-Art.20Right to data portability
→CTDPA-42-518-PORTRight to Data Portability

Chapter IV - Controller and Processor(3 mappings)

GDPR-Art.28Processor
→CTDPA-42-521-PROCESSORProcessor Obligations and Contracts
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing
→CTDPA-42-520-SECURITYReasonable Security Practices
GDPR-Art.35Data protection impact assessment
→CTDPA-42-522-DPAData Protection Assessments

Chapter II - Principles(6 mappings)

GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data2 targets
→CTDPA-42-520-PURPLIMITPurpose Limitation and Data Minimization
→CTDPA-42-520-SECONDARYNo Secondary Use Without Consent
GDPR-Art.7Conditions for consent
→CTDPA-42-520-CONSENTREVOKEConsent and Revocation (No Dark Patterns)
GDPR-Art.8Conditions applicable to child's consent
→CTDPA-42-520-CHILDRENChildren's and Minors' Data
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data2 targets
→CTDPA-42-520-SENSITIVESensitive Data Opt-In Consent
→CTDPA-42-525-CHDConsumer Health Data (PA 23-56)

Related Comparisons

Other GDPR comparisons

GDPR vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)30 mappingsGDPR vs AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)30 mappingsGDPR vs APPI27 mappingsGDPR vs Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)26 mappingsGDPR vs China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)24 mappingsGDPR vs Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015)22 mappingsGDPR vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)21 mappingsGDPR vs Bahrain PDPL20 mappings

Other Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) comparisons

CCPA/CPRA vs Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)9 mappingsRwanda Law No. 058/2021 Relating to the Protection of Personal Data vs Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)5 mappingsCOPPA vs Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 704 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (359K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between GDPR and Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)?

GDPR has 38 controls across its framework, while Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor, where 12 GDPR controls have no direct Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) equivalent.

How many controls map between GDPR and Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)?

Of 38 total GDPR controls, 12 map directly to Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GDPR to Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)?

26 GDPR controls have no direct equivalent in Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GDPR and Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter IV - Controller and Processor (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.