FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsITIL 4
See exactly how FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to ITIL 4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to ITIL 4 with 15% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 445K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 445K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.
Risk Assessment and Safeguard Design(4 mappings)
Incident Response and Reporting(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Other ITIL 4 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 725 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (445K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ITIL 4?
FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 52 controls across its framework, while ITIL 4 covers 53 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 12 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct ITIL 4 equivalent.
How many controls map between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ITIL 4?
Of 52 total FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 8 map directly to ITIL 4 controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to ITIL 4?
44 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in ITIL 4. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ITIL 4?
The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.