Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsIndia Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) with 9% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 357K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 357K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

FTC Safeguards Rule: Scope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)2 targets
RBI-AA-ConsentArchitecture-ConsentArtefact-ExplicitConsent-PurposeLimitation-CustomerDashboard-ORS-CMPRBI AA Consent Architecture - Consent Artefact + Explicit Customer Consent + Purpose Limitation + Customer Consent Dashboard + Online Revocation Service + Consent Management Provider
RBI-AA-Ecosystem-FIPs-FIUs-Interoperability-Onboarding-Sahamati-DPI-IndiaStackRBI AA Ecosystem - Financial Information Providers (FIPs) + Financial Information Users (FIUs) + Interoperability + Sahamati SRO Onboarding + DPI India Stack + Cross-Sector Regulators

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Other India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (357K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 11 controls across its framework, while India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination), where 5 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

Of 11 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 1 map directly to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

10 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI). The highest concentration of gaps is in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.