Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsHungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act)

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act) with 9% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

FTC Safeguards Rule: 9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Encryption, MFA, Disposal, Change, Monitoring, Pen Test (314.4(c))(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
HU-INFOTV-Chap5-NAIH-Authority-Powers-Enforcement-FinesHU Infotv Chap V - NAIH Authority Powers + Investigation + Enforcement + Administrative Fines + Penal Code Sec 219 (Sections 38-71)

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Other Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act)?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 11 controls across its framework, while Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination), where 5 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act)?

Of 11 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 1 map directly to Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act)?

10 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act). The highest concentration of gaps is in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Hungary Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Information (Info Act)?

The domain with the highest gap count is FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.