TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FIDO2 / WebAuthnvsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how FIDO2 / WebAuthn controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FIDO2 / WebAuthn maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 12% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 FIDO2 / WebAuthn controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FIDO2/WebAuthn: CTAP2.1 Client-to-Authenticator Protocol.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

FIDO2/WebAuthn: Authenticators, Passkeys and User Verification(2 mappings)

FIDO2-Passkey-DiscoverablePasskeys (Discoverable Credentials) and Account Recovery2 targets
→OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
→OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures

FIDO2/WebAuthn: Relying Party Implementation, Phishing Resistance and Security(3 mappings)

FIDO2-Phishing-ResistancePhishing Resistance, Channel Binding, Anti-Replay and Privacy3 targets
→OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
→OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
→OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures

Related Comparisons

Other FIDO2 / WebAuthn comparisons

FIDO2 / WebAuthn vs Vermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA)2 mappingsFIDO2 / WebAuthn vs USMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement)2 mappingsFIDO2 / WebAuthn vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappingsFIDO2 / WebAuthn vs Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)2 mappingsFIDO2 / WebAuthn vs TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement2 mappingsFIDO2 / WebAuthn vs SWIFT CSCF2 mappingsFIDO2 / WebAuthn vs Regulation on the European Health Data Space (EHDS)2 mappingsFIDO2 / WebAuthn vs Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ)2 mappings

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs OWASP Top 10:20258 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs OWASP Top 10:20257 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs OWASP Top 10:20257 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs OWASP Top 10:20257 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs OWASP Top 10:20257 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs OWASP Top 10:20257 mappingsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FIDO2 / WebAuthn and OWASP Top 10:2025?

FIDO2 / WebAuthn has 16 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FIDO2/WebAuthn: CTAP2.1 Client-to-Authenticator Protocol, where 3 FIDO2 / WebAuthn controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between FIDO2 / WebAuthn and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 16 total FIDO2 / WebAuthn controls, 2 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FIDO2 / WebAuthn to OWASP Top 10:2025?

14 FIDO2 / WebAuthn controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in FIDO2/WebAuthn: CTAP2.1 Client-to-Authenticator Protocol with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FIDO2 / WebAuthn and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is FIDO2/WebAuthn: CTAP2.1 Client-to-Authenticator Protocol (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.