FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsECB TIBER-EU Framework
See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to ECB TIBER-EU Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to ECB TIBER-EU Framework with 26% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Maturity Levels.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(1 mappings)
Domain 2: Threat Intelligence and Collaboration(6 mappings)
Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(1 mappings)
Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(1 mappings)
Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(3 mappings)
Maturity Levels(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Other ECB TIBER-EU Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ECB TIBER-EU Framework?
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 27 controls across its framework, while ECB TIBER-EU Framework covers 17 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Maturity Levels, where 4 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct ECB TIBER-EU Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ECB TIBER-EU Framework?
Of 27 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 7 map directly to ECB TIBER-EU Framework controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to ECB TIBER-EU Framework?
20 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in ECB TIBER-EU Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Maturity Levels with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ECB TIBER-EU Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is Maturity Levels (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.